Hierarchical Idiocracy

In our now-failing United States economy, the true groundwork of the country is beginning to finally shine through. Now of course, the large business firms remain primarily unscathed, although the illusion of a “company collapse” may provide a “clean out” for the fatcats behind the excel spreadsheet numbers. The true disgust of this business model is that manual, physical labor has completely vanished from the elite management spectrum. Sure they make make an angry phone call, or offer their sacred opinions, but primarily attempt to rule psychologically and with information control.

This shift in the way that humanity operates has not only created an even wider rift between social classes, but it’s created an illusion of power. The term “power” in itself is a conceptual explanation for availability and apparent exercise of control over resources. Given that this fails, the individual is considered a failure with it. Constant maintenance and establishing possible outcomes of uncontrollable variables is the central operating force of this ideology. The failure of it is decentralization of the parties responsible for this. In layman’s terms – Where corporate structure and capitalism failed was in delegating tasks they couldn’t accomplish themselves. But they sure are good at crunching numbers.

Earlier in this century, kings of industry knew the parameters of any job they had assigned to anyone under them, or at a minimum hired a management position to delegate and maintain these positions. Innovation, industrialization, and creation flourished, then along came “micro-management”. The term “micro-management” is simply the most idiotic concept to date. We all find the term familiar, but what does the core of it convey? Let’s examine –

Micromanagement (via wikipedia.com):
micromanagement is a management style where a manager closely observes or controls the work of his or her subordinates or employees. Micromanagement generally has a negative connotation.

The problem?

Well, the “problem” is that workers spend X amount of minutes they could be using for labor creating a report, or tracking their statistics. Not only is the mind of the employee pre-occupied with tracking details for someone who is too fucking lazy to track it themselves, but productivity is cut annually due to the idiots spending X amount of days firing the guy who just happens to hate wasting his time on reports for lazy people, and keeping the lazy bastard who “just needs to focus more”. It’s asking you to fill the void of being a “manager” (subtley called something like “team leader”, because the coporation believes in “family”) , while milking the money you make for them. Kind.

Now of course, the economists argument for this is that “it rounds out”, or that “there is a balance to it”, yet no one’s been able to find that balance. The balance seems to be smooth talking slimeballs who are freaking out because of the crumble of their schemes. It’s actually quite ironic. As the American economy finally becomes focused and controlled by the few powerful elites, the people who can’t manage to live simply freak the hell out and grasp at straws, while people used to living simply don’t even seem to flinch. Strange.

Lost Cause?

We’re brought into this world fed a bowl of lies. Either there is some fluffy guy with a beard in the clouds who has spent forever and a day making *only* your life perfect and orderly, or that same guy in the clouds killed his own kid because he thought you were cooler. We always seem to hear what we want to hear to make us feel comfortable instead of the truth.

The downside to this philosophy is that it’s believing a *possible* truth. Any religion, dogma, belief, or occult is just that – a belief. I decided to walk away from all of these and spawn my own belief system, Idon’tknowism. It’s very simple in the fact that the name of this belief also describes what the basic belief is – Admitting to not knowing the answers. Religion, throughout history has been the number one contributor for war and death, yet we can’t seem to jump over that hurdle. It’s very crafty in the fact that it condemns those who would dare speak against it, and so I decided to steal this model for my belief structure as well.

If we turn the tables, and reflect religion back upon itself we begin to see the irony. Imagine if people had been slaughtered for having any belief whatsoever. This would have made the Spanish Inquisition much more interesting.

I think the truly disturbing aspect of beliefs is that so many people never read for themselves. Among many of these religious texts you’ll find the prophets/soothsayers speak against organizational fraternization, yet we are taught these things by that structure itself. The core practices (on average) speak of being kind to anyone & everyone, which is a very simple concept. What if a Mormon and a Muslim hook up and have kids? You laugh at the very thought of it, but that fact alone demonstrates the rift that religion has caused between humanity itself.

Is it logical to kill someone based on belief?

Is it logical to be unkind to someone based on belief?

Is it logical to that belief should destroy/affect relationships?